Compare Top Business Intelligence Tools

Find the Right Business Intelligence (BI) Software

46 Business Intelligence Reviews Found
Vendor Name: Alteryx
Good: Learning curve for new users, outdated interface.
Bad: Four main levels of product functions: data blending, predictive analytics, spatial analytics, and sharing insights.
Bottom Line: Alteryx offers the ability to deliver actionable insights by seamlessly incorporating internal company information, cloud data, and third party data in a single workflow.
Vendor Name: AnswerRocket
Good: Not intended for small businesses, some early users have reported that the software was buggy at times.
Bad: Ability to work with large datasets and connect to most data sources, flexible visualization options with drill-down capability, self-service functionality with minimal training required.
Bottom Line: Search-powered analytics platform that uses machine-learning technology and smart data discovery to enable users to find answers within their data in seconds.
Vendor Name: BOARD
Good: While BOARD does target small businesses, the software could be too robust for a very small business/team.
Bad: Combines features of BI and corporate performance management in one platform, job-centric solutions available.
Bottom Line: BOARD combines the features of BI and corporate performance management (CPM) into an all-in-one, programming-free solution.
Vendor Name: ClicData
Good: Predictive analytics feature isn't offered yet.
Bad: Free account with the option to upgrade to scalable pricing plans, automatic dashboard refresh when data sources are updated, various options to share dashboards.
Bottom Line: BI platform that allows users to connect data from multiple sources and build intuitive dashboards more efficiently.
Vendor Name: Connexica
Good: AI module was recently launched, but many users may not have access to it yet.
Bad: Supports all data structures and sets, accessible for all users regardless of their techical expertise, Venn diagrams feature shows relationships and trends wtihin data.
Bottom Line: Data discovery solution that leverages search technology so all users can easily gain actionable insights to make better business decisions.
Vendor Name: datapine
Good: Knowledge of SQL may be required in order to use some advanced features.
Bad: Intuitive for any user, from the least experienced business professional to the most advanced data expert.
Bottom Line: Multinational data analytics solution that allows anyone to derive valuable insights from data.
Diver Platform
Vendor Name: Dimensional Insight
Good: Not adept in handling and analyzing large amounts of data, very broad-based software (not ideal for users looking for niche solutions).
Bad: Data integration capability in a single view, easier data discovery tools, fast insights.
Bottom Line: Its Diver Solution includes time-sensitive data integration in a single view, helping users deploy role-based BI throughout their businesses.
Vendor Name: Domo
Good: Expensive for a small business, difficulty with extracting data, on-premise deployment isn't offered.
Bad: Connect data with hundreds of connectors, access information and report from single platform, customized solutions.
Bottom Line: Business management platform that empowers all users to make better business decisions.
Dundas BI
Vendor Name: Dundas
Good: Inability to export multiple PowerPoint slides at once; 3-D charts and city-level maps aren't included as standard features but can be imported by API.
Bad: Combination of BI and analytics in one platform, accessible anywhere at any time, strong focus on self-service.
Bottom Line: Scalable embedded BI platform that enables any user to run data and make faster business decisions.
Vendor Name: FYIsoft, Inc.
Good: Not suitable for single-entity QuickBooks users.
Bad: Integration with ERP software and general ledgers, AI functionality to project future revenue and expenses, more advanced security than spreadsheets.
Bottom Line: Financial reporting and analysis software that empowers finance teams in large companies to improve their productivity.
Vendor Name: GoodData
Good: Time-consuming setup, learning curve for some new end users.
Bad: Shorter implementation process than traditional vendors, robust features, strong security.
Bottom Line: Embedded analytics platform with high scalability and self-service functionality.
Vendor Name:
Good: Ability to send metrics via a Slack direct message is not currently supported, learning curve for some new users.
Bad: Intuitive features and the ability for all employees to access the dashboard as needed.
Bottom Line: A user-friendly, easy-to-build dashboard that visualizes key metrics to track daily progress for more informed decisions.
Vendor Name: IBM
Good: Steep learning curve as software can be robust.
Bad: AI Assistant that learns users’ data and suggests new data joins and visualizations; drag-and-drop capabilities to create new dashboards and reports; data integration from two to many sources
Bottom Line: IBM Cognos Analytics offers users access to a wide range of business analytics functionality to help them make well-informed decisions faster.
Vendor Name: iDashboards
Good: Learning curve for new users.
Bad: Short implementation process, mobile functionality, ability to build dashboards with a series of right-click menus.
Bottom Line: With low cost of ownership and straightforward licensing, iDashboards provides a cost-effective alternative to complex BI solutions.
Vendor Name: InetSoft
Good: Steep learning curve for some users.
Bad: Usable by everyone in company, regardless of BI knowledge, drag-and-drop report designer, data mashups done in real time.
Bottom Line: InetSoft’s proprietary Data Block technology allows for data mashups from most data sources in real time.
Infor ERP software review by Better Buys
Infor Birst
Vendor Name: Infor
Good: Social and collaboration features are not offered.
Bad: Automated Data Refinement feature for extracting data from any source, self-service analytics through dashboards, reporting, visual discovery, and mobile tools, low total cost of ownership.
Bottom Line: BI software that empowers business users wtih easy-to-use tools for faster and accurate decision-making.
Vendor Name: TIBCO
Good: Lack of Impala connectivity, comparatively minimal technical support offered.
Bad: Self-service capability, ability to work with big data, users can build their own data mart or warehouse.
Bottom Line: Jaspersoft has a scalable, modular, standards-based design that allows the flexibility needed for a wide variety of deployments.
Vendor Name: Knowi
Good: Knowi is a young and small BI company. This can cause concern for some potential customers.
Bad: The platform is built for users to blend structured, multi-structured and unstructured data alike.
Bottom Line: A unified analytics platform built to simplify data architectures and help users obtain valuable business insights.
Logi Analytics
Vendor Name: Logi Analytics
Good: Steep learning curve for non-SQL users.
Bad: Available for all company sizes, analytics can be embedded into existing applications, ability to customize CSS and JavaScript to reports.
Bottom Line: For companies that are either skeptical of BI and are seeking immediate ROI, or for others that need to implement a system immediately, LogiAnalytics offers a swift and affordable solution.
Logi Composer
Vendor Name: Logi Analytics
Good: Predictive or profit analysis tools is not offered.
Bad: Speed-of-thought analytics on billions of rows of data, Data DVR tool with real-time real-time data streaming.
Bottom Line: Embedded platform that simplifies data exploration, analysis and visualization on big, streaming and traditional data sources.
Logi Report
Vendor Name: Logi Analytics
Good: Some customers have mentioned there's a learning curve when building reports.
Bad: Flexible tools to create custom, advanced embedded reports and dashboards, support team is responsive and easy to work with.
Bottom Line: JReport is an interactive embedded business intelligence suite that allows developers to create robust reports and dashboards, and embed analytics into current business applications.
Vendor Name: Logility
Good: Robust features could lead to steep learning curve.
Bad: Platform-as-a-service option, data is housed in a single repository, code development and maintenance are automated.
Bottom Line: Flexible and scalable deployment options, including PaaS, offering a lower total cost of ownership than traditional BI software.
Longview Analytics
Vendor Name: Insightsoftware
Good: No automatic reports scheduling.
Bad: Low cost of ownership, mobile functionality, sharing and collaboration focus.
Bottom Line: Longview works with many different data sources, especially other vendors such as SAP, Oracle, IBM, and more.
Looker Data Platform
Vendor Name: Google Cloud
Good: Doesn’t support OLAP functionality, a learning curve for new users, limited customization of visualizations.
Bad: SQL knowledge not required, LookML proprietary data modeling language, implementation done in hours rather than days or weeks.
Bottom Line: Looker's web-based platform allows users to explore data in a timely manner to help them make better business decisions.
Power BI
Vendor Name: Microsoft
Good: Interface isn't always user friendly, challenging for new users to learn at first.
Bad: Familiar, easy-to-use interface similar to Excel with the ability for users to create and import simple visuals.
Bottom Line: Cloud-based BI software that's simple to use, correlates disparate data and gives full visibility of business performance.
Vendor Name: MicroStrategy
Good: Steep learning curve, initial setup and configuration can be time-consuming.
Bad: Big data and Hadoop functionality, ability to take action within dashboard, mobile capability.
Bottom Line: BI solution that allows users to make actionable decisions based on the data in a quick manner - even from within the dashboard itself.
Vendor Name: OpenText
Good: Learning curve for new users.
Bad: AI-augmented analytics platform, flexible deployment options, self-service functionality for end users.
Bottom Line: Analytics tools that empower organizations to make timely business decisions and improve their customer experience.
Oracle Analytics
Vendor Name: Oracle
Good: Occasional slow performance of Oracle Analytics Cloud, steep learning curve for some users.
Bad: Machine learning that provides smart recommendations and fast insights, the ability to collaborate on reports, flexible deployment options.
Bottom Line: BI solution that uses augmented analytics to empower organizations to make faster and better business decisions.
Vendor Name: Hitachi Vantara
Good: Interface is not always intuitive, some users are unable to find explanation of cause of specific errors.
Bad: Combination of data integration and analytical processing, first BI tool to market direct reporting for NoSQL, wide variety of reporting solutions.
Bottom Line: Pentaho's unique ability to cross data integration with business analytics unites IT and end-users, helping them integrate and visualize the information that is most important to business results.
Vendor Name: Phocas Software
Good: Could use more options, especially in customization, for visualization tools.
Bad: Unique features, such as geospatial analysis and rebates and commissions module, three deployment options, strong security features.
Bottom Line: Phocas is flexible, scalable, and easy to use software that allow users to perform BI analysis themselves.
Vendor Name: Pyramid Analytics
Good: Phone support and online support ticket submissions require a purchase of paid support plan.
Bad: Platform-agnostic so it's accessible for any user, six analytical modules with a wide range of features, free Community plan for smaller teams.
Bottom Line: Platform-agnostic solution that's designed for any user, regardless of technical expertise.
Qlik Sense
Vendor Name: Qlik
Good: Advanced customization options may require integration with a third-party application.
Bad: Robust drill-down features, self-service with drag-and-drop capabilities, augmented analytics functionality.
Bottom Line: A flexible and scalable data analysis and visualization tool for a full spectrum of users.
Vendor Name: Qlik
Good: Self-service difficulty for non-tech users, some filtering issues at the end user and developer levels.
Bad: Google-like search protocol for finding data, ability to combine data sources, no need to rely on IT.
Bottom Line: Qlik's in-memory processor vastly speeds up the application and allows it to refresh in real-time, providing insights as data is added.
Vendor Name: Infragistics
Good: Software is in its infancy, so it is missing some more advanced features.
Bad: Transparent pricing structure, the ability to create and edit dashboards without having to use a separate software, multiple data connectors supported.
Bottom Line: Flexible and easy-to-integrate embedded BI solution that doesn't require a lot of time on the developer's end.
Vendor Name: SAP
Good: Confusing licensing process, frequent support fee hikes, tend to be complex for non-tech users.
Bad: Minimal or no involvement from IT, BI analysis done from multiple data sources and in different formats, accessible via any platform.
Bottom Line: Broader BI solution with self-service functionality.
Visual Analytics
Vendor Name: SAS
Good: OLAP and profit analysis features are not offered; users can create data views but changes to those views are not spread out to all reports that reference it.
Bad: SAS Visual Analytics combines data preparation, interactive reporting, visual discovery, self-service analytics, scalability and governance all from a single, powerful in-memory environment.
Bottom Line: SAS Visual Analytics provides a modern, integrated environment for governed discovery and exploration with easy-to-use analytics and visualizations that help everyone get insights from data to better solve complex business problems.
Vendor Name: Sisense
Good: Visualizations don't include 3D graphics.
Bad: Fast implementation and time to insight, innovative in-chip technology processes volumes of data from many data sources, provides top-notch customer experience, and premier rankings in customer satisfaction.
Bottom Line: BI solution that delivers radically innovative technology with machine learning and AI, instant insights and value, and top-notch customer support.
Vendor Name: Slemma
Good: With databases and warehouses, Slemma often requires someone knowledgable in SQL to perform table-joins and create new views for visualization.
Bad: Integrates with many common third-party solutions and disparate data sources.
Bottom Line: A simple business analytics and data visualization tool that uses interactive dashboards to share information.
Vendor Name: Tableau Software
Good: Customers have mentioned a steep learning curve for executives, and the system tends to be slow at times when dealing with large datasets.
Bad: Robust drill-down and visualization tools make data understandable for all types of users.
Bottom Line: Tableau provides users with intuitive BI tools to enhance data discovery and understanding.
TARGIT Decision Suite
Vendor Name: TARGIT
Good: Difficulty in setting up calculations within reports, difficulty with graph tools in conjunction with Excel.
Bad: Automatic alerts, all BI tools in one platform, real-time dashboards.
Bottom Line: TARGIT allows non-expert end-users to create and access reports and analysis easily and efficiently.
Vendor Name: Tellius Inc.
Good: Automatic analytics may be a challenge for those who use manual analytics, company is still relatively new player in BI market.
Bad: Accessible for all users regardless of technical expertise, SearchQL engine that suggests recommended answers as a user types in a question, predictive modeling functionality.
Bottom Line: Business intelligence solution that uses machine-learning algorithms to find trends, patterns and answers in a matter of seconds.
TIBCO Spotfire
Vendor Name: TIBCO
Good: Challenging learning curve for new users.
Bad: Ability to perform statistical analysis, automatically run reports and analysis at set times, ability to drill down to find root causes of business issues.
Bottom Line: TIBCO Spotfire is ideal for companies looking to improve their sales and marketing practices and their customer experience.
Vendor Name: TIBCO
Good: Learning curve for new users.
Bad: Configurable features, scalability, augmented analytics.
Bottom Line: Embedded analytics that can work with most tools and data sources.
Vendor Name: Yellowfin
Good: Does not include financial forecasting or profit analysis.
Bad: Yellowfin Signals that provides automated analysis to the user based on data patterns and outliers, Yellowfin Data Storytelling that combines data reports into one narrative, five components that can be used individually or all together.
Bottom Line: Yellowfin Analytics Suite offers automated analysis, storytelling and collaboration.
Zoho Analytics
Vendor Name: Zoho
Good: Some users would like additional types of charts and widgets, as well as business app connectors (e.g., SAP).
Bad: Robust features, flexible deployment, integration with over 500 third-party applications, scalable pricing.
Bottom Line: Self-service BI software with AI and other features for creating, sharing and tracking important metrics.